5 Ways Managers Misuse AI & How to Fix It

AI is useful. But most managers misuse AI without realizing it.

Not in a “robots are taking over” way. In a “you’re asking it to do things it can’t do” way. The result is wasted time, generic outputs, and the creeping suspicion that maybe AI isn’t as helpful as everyone claims.

It is helpful. You’re just misusing it.

These are the five most common mistakes I see managers make with AI — and how to fix each one. Get these right and you’ll stop fighting the tool and start actually benefiting from it.

Misuse #1: Expecting AI to Evaluate Performance

The mistake is asking AI to judge your people.

“Was this a good year for my team member?” “Based on these notes, should I rate them as meets expectations or exceeds?” “Is this performance strong enough for a promotion?”

AI will answer confidently. It will sound reasonable. And it will be completely meaningless.

AI doesn’t know your standards. It doesn’t know what “good” looks like on your team, what the expectations were at the start of the year, or how this person compares to others in similar roles. It doesn’t know the context — the reorganization in Q2, the impossible deadline in Q3, the project that got canceled.

It will generate an evaluation that sounds right but means nothing. And if you use it, you’ve just outsourced your judgment to something that has none.

The fix: Use AI to organize and articulate, not to judge.

You evaluate. AI helps you express it.

Instead of “Was this good performance?” try “Help me articulate why this performance was strong. Here’s what they accomplished: [list]. Here’s the context: [context].”

The thinking is yours. The writing can be AI’s. That’s exactly how the ChatGPT performance review method works — you provide the judgment, AI helps you draft it clearly.

Misuse #2: Expecting Authentic Writing on the First Try

The mistake is pasting a prompt, copying the output, and hitting send.

You ask AI to write an email. It writes an email. You paste it into Outlook and fire it off. Then you wonder why it sounds like every other corporate email anyone’s ever received.

AI defaults to corporate-speak. “I hope this email finds you well.” “Please don’t hesitate to reach out.” “I wanted to circle back on our previous conversation.” It’s technically correct and completely lifeless.

AI doesn’t know your voice. It doesn’t know your relationship with the recipient. It doesn’t know that your team communicates in Slack one-liners, not formal paragraphs. It doesn’t know that your VP hates fluff and your skip-level loves context.

First drafts are starting points, not finished products.

The fix: Treat AI output as a rough draft.

The 80/20 rule applies here. AI does 80% of the work — structure, flow, getting words on the page. You do 20% to make it yours — cutting the fluff, adding your phrasing, removing the parts that don’t sound like you.

Or train it upfront: “Write in a direct, conversational tone. No corporate jargon. Short sentences. I’m writing to someone I’ve worked with for two years.”

The goal isn’t perfect output on the first try. It’s a draft you can edit faster than you could write from scratch.

Misuse #3: Assuming AI Knows Your Company Culture

The mistake is expecting AI to understand how your organization actually works.

“Write something appropriate for my team.” “Draft this in a way that fits our culture.” “Make it sound like something leadership would send.”

AI has no idea what any of that means. It doesn’t know if your company is buttoned-up or casual. It doesn’t know if your CEO sends three-word Slack messages or five-paragraph emails. It doesn’t know the unwritten rules — that certain phrases land badly, that certain topics require certain framing, that your skip-level hates bullet points.

So it guesses. And the guess is usually generic corporate middle-ground that doesn’t fit anywhere particularly well.

You end up with outputs that technically work but feel off. Or worse, you send something that clashes with how things are actually done and people notice.

The fix: Provide context explicitly.

Don’t say “make it appropriate.” Say “Our culture is casual and direct. Leadership prefers short emails with bullet points over long paragraphs. We don’t use phrases like ‘synergy’ or ‘circle back.'”

Better yet, give it an example. “Here’s an email my VP sent last week. Match this tone.” AI is great at mimicking when you give it something to mimic.

And always review through the lens of “Would this actually fly here?” If you’re not sure, it probably wouldn’t.

Misuse #4: Using AI to Replace Documentation

The mistake is thinking AI eliminates the need to write things down.

“AI will summarize the meeting so I don’t need notes.” “I’ll just ask AI to reconstruct what we discussed.” “I can always feed it my emails and it’ll figure out the context.”

This falls apart fast.

Most AI tools don’t remember past conversations. Every chat starts fresh. That brilliant back-and-forth you had last Tuesday? Gone. The context you carefully built up over three prompts? Wiped the moment you closed the window.

And even tools with memory have limits. They remember fragments, not full context. They can’t reconstruct the nuance of a decision, the reasons behind a tradeoff, or the political dynamics that shaped a conversation.

Garbage in, garbage out. If you feed AI vague inputs because you didn’t document properly, you get vague outputs. The people who get the most from AI are the ones with good notes, clear records, and organized files to feed it.

The fix: Document first, then use AI to enhance.

Keep your own notes, meeting summaries, and decision logs. AI augments your documentation system — it doesn’t replace it.

Use AI to clean up your rough notes, turn bullet points into summaries, or extract action items from a transcript. But the raw material has to exist first.

The managers who complain AI “doesn’t work” often have nothing useful to give it. That’s why having a system for 1-on-1 meetings matters — good inputs create good outputs.

Misuse #5: Letting AI Make Decisions

The mistake is asking AI to tell you what to do.

“Should I promote this person?” “Is this the right strategy?” “What should I do about this underperformer?” “Should I take this job offer?”

AI will answer. It loves answering. It will lay out considerations, weigh pros and cons, and often land on a recommendation that sounds perfectly reasonable.

But AI doesn’t have accountability. You do.

It doesn’t know the factors it doesn’t know about — the politics, the history, the relationships, the things you haven’t told it. It can’t weigh your gut feeling or factor in the conversation you had in the hallway last week. It doesn’t have to live with the consequences.

Confident-sounding advice isn’t the same as good advice. And if you follow it and it goes wrong, you can’t blame the chatbot in your next skip-level meeting.

The fix: Use AI to think through decisions, not make them.

Ask it to pressure-test your thinking. “Here’s what I’m leaning toward and why. What am I missing? What could go wrong? What questions should I be asking myself?”

Ask it to play devil’s advocate. “Argue against this decision.” “What’s the strongest case for the other option?”

Ask it to organize your thinking. “I’m torn between these three options. Help me lay out the tradeoffs for each.”

You own the decision. AI helps you prepare for it.

The Pattern

These are the five ways managers misuse AI most often — and they all share the same root: treating AI as a replacement instead of a tool.

AI is excellent at drafting, organizing, brainstorming, formatting, and speeding things up. It’s bad at judging, deciding, knowing context, and being you.

The managers getting real value from AI understand this distinction. They use it for the mechanical work — the blank page problem, the first draft, the structure — and keep the judgment for themselves.

The managers who are frustrated are the ones expecting AI to do things it was never designed to do. Then they blame the tool when it fails.

Start Using AI Right

These mistakes are common because AI makes everything look easy. Ask a question, get an answer. It feels like it should just work.

But the quality of what you get depends entirely on how you use it. Fix these five mistakes and you’ll get more value with less frustration.

If you’re still figuring out which AI tools are worth your time, the Best AI Tools for Managers guide breaks down what actually works for management tasks.

Tools like ChatGPT and Claude are powerful — but only if you use them correctly.

AI isn’t magic. It’s a tool. Use it like one.

Frequently Asked Questions